Friday, September 26, 2008
Monday, September 1, 2008
http://www.diversityworld.com/Disability/newsletter.htm
NEWSLETTER
D-NETPicture of DNET Newsletter
Disability Network Newsletter
"Your newsletters and insightful writing are always welcomed with anticipation! Thanks for your excellent work "
"I just had to send a brief message to express my sentiments about this newsletter..."WOW"! And THANKS! So much practical information. Fantastic resource, folks! Keep up the great work. You're helping me help others!"
"As a high school special education teacher, I feel your articles give practical and very valuable information that address the needs of my students. Thank you for all the work you do to promote employment for the special needs population!!!"
"My sincere thanks for such a valuable resource! I devour the information you provide."
Get Our Newsletters Now - Sign Up
Posted by iRDMuni at 1:54 PM 0 comments
Saturday, June 28, 2008
National Aphasia Association
NEW YORK, June 17 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- In recognition of the urgent
need for more public awareness about aphasia Senate Resolution 566 (sponsored
by Senator Tim Johnson, D-SD) and House Resolution 1188 (sponsored by
Representative Edward Markey, D-Mass), declare June as National Aphasia
Awareness Month. Aphasia is the sudden inability to communicate, speak, read,
write or understand language, usually as a result of stroke or traumatic brain
injury. It is estimated that over 1 million Americans have aphasia, and the
number of new aphasia cases is estimated to be as high as over 200,000 per
year.
"I was proud to introduce a resolution recognizing National Aphasia
Awareness Month, which passed the Senate unanimously. During my recovery, I
was blessed to work with professional and talented speech-language
pathologists whose confidence was infectious and who motivated me to work
harder than I thought possible," said Sen. Johnson, who suffered the effects
of an arterio-venous malformation (AVM) in December 2006 and also credits the
love and support of his wife, family and friends for making an important
difference in his recovery.
According to National Aphasia Association Executive Director Ellayne
Ganzfried, "there is no cure for aphasia, but speech-language therapy and
constant social interaction is essential for recovery and maintaining a
meaningful life. Because of their difficulty in communicating, over 70% of
people with aphasia report that people avoided contact with them and 90
percent felt isolated, left out, ignored and lonely. This isolation, coupled
with the fact that intellect remains intact, makes depression another serious
result of aphasia."
Representative Edward Markey, whose resolution is expected to get
unanimous support, says, "Aphasia is a 'silent' disability because it quiets
people and causes them to withdraw from life. My hope is that National Aphasia
Awareness Month will help give a voice to people with aphasia so that their
needs and concerns can be heard. Aphasia is a condition that has affected a
number of my friends and colleagues, so I know from personal experience it is
an issue that deserves a lot of acknowledgement and attention."
"Aphasia is more common than cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy, spinal
cord injuries, multiple sclerosis or Parkinson's disease, yet it is relatively
unknown by the general public," says Ganzfried, who is grateful to Sen.
Johnson, Rep. Markey and other legislators for helping to raise awareness for
aphasia.
"Among those who have heard of aphasia, there are serious misconceptions
about the mental condition of people with aphasia. We are trying to make it
absolutely clear that aphasia does not affect a person's intellect. Aphasia
does not make someone mentally ill. It only challenges their ability to
communicate," explains Ganzfried. To further help raise awareness, the Sixth
National NAA Conference -- Speaking Out! 2008 -- will be held June 19-21, 2008
at NYU's Kimmel Center. The conference brings together medical/rehabilitation
professionals, people with aphasia, family members, caregivers and the general
public.
Aphasia can occur in people of all ages, nationalities, socio-economic
backgrounds and equally among men and women. Understanding, patience and a few
commonsense strategies will help family, friends, caregivers and the public
communicate with people with aphasia:
1) Have the person's attention before you speak.
2) Minimize or eliminate background noise (TV, radio, other people).
3) Keep your own voice at a normal level.
4) Keep communication simple, but adult.
5) Give them time to speak, resist the urge to finish sentences or offer
words.
6) Communicate with drawings, gestures, writing and facial expressions.
7) Confirm that you are communicating successfully with "yes" and "no"
questions.
8) Praise all attempts to speak and downplay any errors.
9) Engage in normal activities whenever possible.
10) Encourage independence, avoid being overprotective.
National Aphasia Association
NAA is a consumer-focused, not-for-profit organization that was founded in
1987 as the first national organization dedicated to advocating for persons
with aphasia and their families. Resources include:
The Aphasia Quiz on www.aphasia.org
NAA Hotline (800-922-4622) helps over 4,000 families a year.
NAA National Registry links to over 440 aphasia US support groups and 210
state representatives.
www.aphasia.org receives over 9,000 hits per month, helping an estimated
100,000 families a year.
The Aphasia Handbook: A Guide for Stroke and Brain Injury Survivors and
Their Families -- with its simple, illustrated design and practical,
non-technical content -- this award-winning, internationally acclaimed book is
a user-friendly, easy-to-understand resource.
Posted by iRDMuni at 5:39 PM 0 comments
Speaking in Gibberish and Writing Constantly
This article in Scientic American hints at some potential health-related impacts of blogging (all positive by the way). According to the article:
Uh huh, gibberish, constant writing, bloggers… all cut from the same cloth.
Posted by iRDMuni at 5:22 PM 0 comments
Relationships between behavior, brainstem and cortical encoding of seen and heard speech in musicians and non-musicians
Posted by iRDMuni at 12:38 PM 0 comments
Saturday, May 10, 2008
Sunday, March 16, 2008
Saturday, March 15, 2008
Alexia and agraphia
Contrasting perspectives of J.-M. Charcot and J. Hughlings Jackson
Posted by iRDMuni at 7:28 PM 0 comments
Right hemisphere activation in recovery from aphasia
Lesion effect or function recruitment?
Posted by iRDMuni at 7:20 PM 0 comments
Sunday, March 9, 2008
Speech therapy and feeding...geriatrics...occupational therapy...
Posted by iRDMuni at 8:08 PM 0 comments
Thursday, January 17, 2008
The neurotoxicity and safety of treatment with cefepime in patients with renal failure
Posted by iRDMuni at 5:21 PM 0 comments
Mirror Neurons -- Rock Stars or Backup Singers?
Greg Hickok
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience
University of California, Irvine
Mirror neurons are the rock stars of cognitive neuroscience. Discovered in the mid-1990s by Giacomo Rizzolatti and his colleagues at the University of Parma, these brain cells have been claimed to be the neural basis for a host of complex human behaviors including imitation, action understanding, language, empathy, and mind-reading – not psychic mind-reading, but our capacity to "get inside someone else's head" and imagine how they feel or what they might do. Meanwhile, dysfunction of the mirror neuron system has been linked to developmental disorders, such as autism. With that kind of explanatory range, it's no surprise that mirror neurons have headlined in all forms of news media. But is this rock star status deserved? Will mirror neurons have the star power longevity of Mick Jagger? Or are they just back up singers?
The hidden mirror
So what exactly are mirror neurons? While studying neurons in motor areas of the frontal lobe of the Rhesus monkey brain, Rizzolatti's team noticed that some cells were responsive not only when the monkey performed an action, such as grasping a raisin, but also when the monkey simply watched the experimenter perform the same action. It was as if these neurons were simulating, or mirroring, a perceived action in the motor system of the animal. This is a very interesting and important finding, showing that sensory and motor systems interact in the brain's cortex at the single cell level.
But the interpretation of mirror neurons since then has extended well beyond sensory-motor interaction. For example, some have speculated that mirror neurons are the basis for our ability to understand the actions of others: because we know the consequences of our own actions, we can understand and anticipate the intended consequences of others' actions by activating similar neural networks in our own motor system. This concept was quickly generalized to more complex functions: because we speak, feel emotion, and have a sense of our own intentions, the theory goes, we can understand the speech of others, empathize, and "mind-read" intentions by mapping other people's behaviors onto our own mirror neuron system.
What is really being reflected?
Is the speculation that mirror neurons are responsible for "understanding" the behavior of others justified? Or are mirror neurons involved in less lofty, but nonetheless important, mental functions? A new study -- "Sensosirmotor Leaning Configures the Human Mirror System," from Current Biology (abstract or pdf download -- suggests the latter. Carolyn Catmur, Vincent Walsh, and Cecilia Heyes, researchers at University College London's Institute of Cognitive Science, stimulated the hand-related portions of motor cortex of human volunteers while they watched videos of hands performing movements of the index or little finger. Stimulation was accomplished using "transcranial magnetic stimulation" (or TMS), in which magnetic pulses are passed through the skull to induce brief electrical currents in the underlying brain tissue. TMS of motor cortex hand areas results in electrical neural impulses being transmitted to the hand itself, where these impulses can be measured by placing electrodes over the finger muscles. The researchers found that when a volunteer watched index finger movement, motor-cortex stimulation by TMS led to stronger electrical signals in the participant's own index finger compared to the pinky, and vice-versa when watching pinky finger movement. This is a mirror-neuron-like effect. Watching a video of index finger movement induces activation of the observer's own motor system controlling index finger movement. This naturally induced activity then sums with the TMS-induced activity to produce stronger than normal neural signals in the index finger muscles.
The mirror neuron theorists would say that our "understanding" of this movement is a result of this heightened activation of our own motor system. But Catmur and colleagues went beyond this basic mirror neuron result. After their initial measurements, they trained the participants to make "counter-mirror" movements: that is, when you see the index finger move, move your own pinky finger, and vice-versa. After this training, the brain responses were reassessed -- and a reversal of the mirror effect was found: watching index-finger movement resulted in more electrical activity in the pinky, and watching pinky movement produced more activity in the index finger. The brain learned new sensory-motor associations, and it is these associations that underlie the mirror neuron-like effect.
Fodder for, not parent of
This is a very nice demonstration that mirror system-like activity is subject to sensory-motor learning, suggesting it is learned rather than hard-wired. But the real question for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding is what these newly trained volunteers "understand" about these movements. Since viewing index finger movement induces activity in the participants' pinky motor systems, do they now think they are viewing little finger movement? Of course not. They still understand that they are viewing index finger movement. Conclusion: mirror system activation is not necessarily correlated with "understanding" but rather with sensory-motor learning.
This dissociation between mirror neuron-like activity and understanding comes as no real surprise. We know from decades (centuries even) of research involving patients with aphasia (language deficits resulting from brain damage, typically stroke) that it is possible to lose virtually all ability to articulate words while retaining the ability to understand the meaning of spoken words. Loss of the motor system controlling speech production, which contains the mirror system for speech, does not result in loss of the ability to understand the speech actions of others. It is also possible for the reverse situation to happen: in some patients with damage that spares the mirror system, the ability to repeat the speech of others may be intact (indicating intact sensory-motor associations), and yet they fail to understand the words. As in the study described above, mirror system function and action understanding dissociate.
The implications are clear. The mirror neuron system is not the neural basis for action understanding. This is true for simple limb actions of the sort that led to the discovery of mirror neurons in the monkey, and it is true for the first complex human behavior that the mirror neuron theory was generalized to, namely speech. If the mirror neuron theory shatters for these behaviors, its generalization to abilities like empathy or "mind-reading" seems ridiculously overstated.
This is not to say that a neural network supporting sensory-motor associations isn't important, or even that such associations are irrelevant to action understanding, language and the like. It seems quite likely that these higher-level systems make use of information derived from sensory-motor linkages. But that mirror neurons provide information that gets used by this high-level understanding does not mean that mirror neurons encode and produce this high-level understanding. You might be able to train a parrot to say "I can't get no satisfaction" -- but that doesn't mean he understands the message. Despite the hype to the contrary, mirror neurons are not the Mick Jagger of cognitive neuroscience. But there's no shame in singing backup. After all, who would want to sit through two hours of Mick singing a cappella? You need a whole band to make good music. The brain works the same way.
Gregory Hickok is professor of cognitive neuroscience and the director of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of California, Irvine. He blogs on the neural underpinnings of language at Talking Brains and contributes to a UC Irvine cog-sci group blog as well.
Posted by iRDMuni at 4:51 PM 0 comments
Spoken-word processing in aphasia
Posted by iRDMuni at 3:31 PM 0 comments
Are regular and irregular verbs dissociated in non-fluent aphasia? A meta-analysis
Posted by iRDMuni at 3:24 PM 0 comments
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
Process skill rather than motor skill ..
... seems to be a predictor of costs for rehabilitation after a stroke in working age; a longitudinal study with a 1 year follow up post discharge
Ann Bjorkdahl email and Katharina S Sunnerhagen email
BMC Health Services Research 2007, 7:209doi:10.1186/1472-6963-7-209
Published: 21 December 2007
Abstract (provisional)
Background
In recent years a number of costs of stroke studies have been conducted based on incidence or prevalence and estimating costs at a given time. As there still is a need for a deeper understanding of factors influencing these costs the aim of this study was to calculate the direct and indirect costs in a "young" (<65) sample of stroke patients and to explore factors affecting the costs.
Posted by iRDMuni at 11:44 AM 0 comments
The Mini-Mental State Examination in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia and Primary Progressive Aphasia
Posted by iRDMuni at 11:16 AM 0 comments
How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: Evidence from aphasia
from Brain and Language
We report on three experiments that provide a real-time processing perspective on the poor comprehension of Broca’s aphasic patients for non-canonically structured sentences. In the first experiment we presented sentences (via a Cross Modal Lexical Priming (CMLP) paradigm) to Broca’s patients at a normal rate of speech. Unlike the pattern found with unimpaired control participants, we observed a general slowing of lexical activation and a concomitant delay in the formation of syntactic dependencies involving “moved” constituents and empty elements. Our second experiment presented these same sentences at a slower rate of speech. In this circumstance, Broca’s patients formed syntactic dependencies as soon as they were structurally licensed (again, a different pattern from that demonstrated by the unimpaired control group). The third experiment used a sentence-picture matching paradigm to chart Broca’s comprehension for non-canonically structured sentences (presented at both normal and slow rates). Here we observed significantly better scores in the slow rate condition. We discuss these findings in terms of the functional commitment of the left anterior cortical region implicated in Broca’s aphasia and conclude that this region is crucially involved in the formation of syntactically-governed dependency relations, not because it supports knowledge of syntactic dependencies, but rather because it supports the real-time implementation of these specific representations by sustaining, at the least, a lexical activation rise-time parameter.
Posted by iRDMuni at 10:54 AM 0 comments